MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137929139 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2014.0079

La désolation par Jérémie Leduc-Leblanc

2014· article· fr· W3137929139 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eileen M. Angelini

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWonderArtArt historySisterHumanitiesPsychoanalysisHistoryPhilosophyLawPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

one starts to sympathize with him a little, or at least to wonder. Telmosse seems to spend his days replaying his daughter Audrey’s accidental death (she is hit by a car crossing a major street with her bicycle). His relationship with his wife Suzanne has unraveled, and his interactions with Audrey’s surviving sister, Ophélie, also suffer from his unending grief. Leblanc has even woven excerpts from Audrey’s diary into the text, lending a surprising elegance to the portrayal of the grieving father’s pain and confusion . Revealing how the seemingly inevitable encounter between Berthiaume and Telmosse plays out would be a disservice, since that encounter is both central to the experience of the novel as a whole and also somewhat stunning. Leblanc’s economy of language is striking in this third novel. His first two, Quinze secondes de célébrité (2009) and Quelques jours à vivre (2012), proved he could write well about Montreal’s underbelly. Zagreb confirms that he can write a pretty good father-daughter story, too. University of Wisconsin, Madison Ritt Deitz Leduc-Leblanc, Jérémie. La désolation. Montréal: Triptyque, 2013. ISBN 978-289031 -874-8. Pp. 177. $20 Can. This collection of eighteen short stories explores the feelings of bleak resignation when one is faced with the horrific reality of such events as death, abandonment, suicide, or rape. In “Step by step,” flight attendant Penny Marshall has her throat slit by a man who apologizes for doing so:“Quand je posai enfin une main sur ma gorge, je l’entendis murmurer un faible ‘je suis désolé, je suis désolé’ en secouant la tête de gauche à droite” (21). The story continues with Penny reliving her day one step at a time in the few minutes before she dies. However, what makes this story especially memorable is the fact that the events of her day are told in reverse order. In other words, the narration of events begins with the one just before Penny is attacked and one by one, or step by step, ends with the way her day started in Boston. At first the reader feels unsettled by this unique re-wind narration style as the transitions between paragraphs do not seem to make sense. Learning about Penny’s co-workers, the mundane aspects of her job, her reasons for staying with her boyfriend Gary, and her morning commute to the airport, helps the reader relate to Penny, especially as she comes to grips with her imminent death. Equally unforgettable is “Flor de rétama,” the unsettling story of a young man who, when returning home shortly after midnight, is violently attacked and raped by his brother and his gang of friends:“mon frère évite toujours de croiser le regard de ses victimes, de peur de s’y reconnaître. Le temps pour moi de décliner mon identité [...] il avait déjà baissé son pantalon devant ses copains qui jubilaient et commençait à me pénétrer” (37). Like “Step by step,” what distinguishes Leduc-Leblanc’s narrative style in“Flor de rétama”is his singular approach in presenting the victim’s point of view. This time, the victim is in a coma and his thoughts are relayed from the hazy mist of it: “même si personne n’aime se faire 270 FRENCH REVIEW 88.2 Reviews 271 massacrer par son propre frère, les conflits œdipiens ont toujours la cote auprès de l’académie” (40). Completely powerless to tell his family and doctor that it is his brother who raped him, he becomes increasingly frustrated as his girlfriend first reads a children’s story to him and then the headlines from the daily newspaper where he learns that he is described as the victim of a heinous and gratuitous crime. Once again, the reader’s unease becomes one with the victim’s pain. These short stories are not for the faint of heart. Yet, one would be hard pressed to find another author who is able to enter so adeptly into the mindset of the victims of perverse crimes. Canisius College (NY) Eileen M. Angelini Lemaitre, Pierre. Au revoir...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical · Other

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207