Gaussian-Wiener Representation and Hierarchical Coding Scheme for Focal Stack Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Focal stack images (FoSIs) are a set of 2D images that captured one scene with serial focal depths. The redundancies of FoSIs mainly come from gradual focused depths changes rather than motion of objects. Conventional coding schemes cannot fully exploit such redundancies, leading to coding inefficiency. In this paper, we propose a new Gaussian-Wiener representation to model the gradual focused depths changes among FoSIs. In the representation, image degradation-restoration relations are utilized to describe the focus-defocus changing characteristics of FoSIs. Based on this representation, we propose a new hierarchical coding scheme for fully exploiting the inter-frame redundancies of FoSIs. In the scheme, a Gaussian-Wiener representation based inter prediction (GWR-IP) is presented by embedding Gaussian convolution and Wiener deconvolution into normal video encoder. Block-wise focus-defocus changing of FoSIs can be predicted in bi-directional manner by solving optimization problem. For higher coding efficiency, a Gaussian-Wiener representation based hierarchical prediction structure (GWR-HPS) is also designed and applied in the coding scheme. The proposed coding scheme is performed on 10 test sequences, including 5 synthetic scenes and 5 realistic scenes. Experimental results show that proposed coding scheme can obtain 2.640 dB PSNR gains and 51.830% bitrate savings on average of all test sequences in Low Delay P configuration, 2.123 dB PSNR gains and 43.975% bitrate savings in Low Delay B configuration, and 1.044 dB PSNR gains and 26.078% bitrate savings in Random Access configuration. Particularly, it achieves up to 65.544% bit rate savings and 3.901 dB PSNR increments for test sequence I09 in Low Delay P configuration. Furthermore, ablation test demonstrates that Gaussian representation contributes more on coding performance than Wiener representation and GWR-HPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".