MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137988390 · doi:10.3138/mous.17.1.03

Euripides’ Electra 1351–1352: A New Interpretation

2020· article· en· W3137988390 on OpenAlex
Ana C. Vicente Sánchez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónUniversidad de ZaragozaUniversidad de MurciaPrinceton University
KeywordsAdjectiveInterpretation (philosophy)NounLinguisticsPhilosophyOrder (exchange)EpistemologyComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eur. El. 1351–1352 has always been problematic for editors and translators. Usually, they supply the article τό with ὅσιον in order to translate ὅσιον (“piety”) and τὸ δίκαιον (“justice) as coordinated nouns. At the same time, editors never add the article to their texts because it gives a metrically incorrect line. Another issue is that there are no examples in Greek where the article governing two coordinated nouns is given with the second noun but has to be supplied for the first (where it is strictly necessary). This paper proposes that ὅσιον is in fact an adjective (i.e., “pious”), which is not connected to the noun τὸ δίκαιον but to the adjective ϕίλον (“loved”). This interpretation can be justified through the work itself and also by exploring the use of the adjective ὅσιος in different tragedies by Euripides and in other authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it