MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138006058 · doi:10.1080/15567036.2021.1887974

Latest advances on hybrid solar–biomass power plants

2021· article· en· W3138006058 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyFossil fuelBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceGreenhouse gasSolar energyPopulationElectricity generationEnvironmental economicsNatural resource economicsEngineeringWaste managementPower (physics)Ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With an increasing global population, energy demand is rising as well. The limitation of fossil fuels, climate change, and environmental concerns due to the usage of these fuels, have led to considerable attention to renewable energies in the last few decades. Solar energy and biomass are two of the best available sources of renewable energy in most parts of the world. However, each of them suffers from some drawbacks. Solar radiation is only available for a limited time during a day, and its availability can be intermittent or reduced depending on the weather and season. On the other hand, extracting energy from biomass demands a huge feedstock, which may not be readily available in all locations and seasons. Transporting biomass would not only increase costs but would also increase carbon monoxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption by transport systems. A combination of both sources is a promising method to lower greenhouse gas emissions and reliable energy investment. The hybridization of these energy resources and applications in a power plant has attracted the attention of researchers in recent years. This study presents an in-depth review of the latest advances in integrating solar and biomass energy in power plants and summarizes and discusses the past effort and the current status of hybrid power plants, their performance, different feasible combinations, and challenges. This review can be a useful reference to investigate the performance of a hybrid solar-biomass power plant in terms of energy, environmental, economical aspects, and conduct readers to future work and novel ideas in this field. A thorough review of the literature reveals that despite that several studies have been conducted in this field, there is currently only one operational hybrid solar-biomass power plant; Termosolar Borges, with a capacity of 22.5 MWe, which is located in Les Borges, Spain. However, some small-scale prototypes are constructed and aimed to extend to a large scale. In terms of possible hybridization scenarios and performance, among solar energy technology, concentrated solar power is a more suitable and proven technology than PV for the hybridization with biomass fuels. Among technologies applied to utilize power from biomass fuels, combustion has proven to be a more economically viable input heat for typical power plants than gasification. In contrast, gasification offered a better option for a larger scale, as the overall cost decreased significantly with scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it