MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138120159 · doi:10.1093/jalm/jfaa164

Reducing Phlebotomy Tube Collection Types by Performing a Complete Review of All In-House Testing

2021· review· en· W3138120159 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ken Onuska

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsHalTech
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhlebotomyMedicineFamily medicineGeneral surgeryMedical physicsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reducing Phlebotomy Tube Collection Types by Performing a Complete Review of All In-House Testing Ken Onuska Ken Onuska Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Halton Healthcare, Oakville, ON, Canada Address correspondence to this author at: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3001 Hospital Gate, Oakville, Ontario, L6M 0L8, Canada. E-mail konuska@mbox.re. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, Volume 6, Issue 3, May 2021, Pages 808–811, https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa164 Published: 20 March 2021 Article history Received: 25 November 2019 Accepted: 01 June 2020 Published: 20 March 2021

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Applied Laboratory MedicineSame topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207