MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3138155051 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2013.0178

Le défaut du ciel by Philippe Renonçay

2013· article· fr· W3138155051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roland A. Champagne

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPseudonymArtPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

on ne sait si on mangera ou non, “accomplir quelque chose, inventer un changement , contribuer à un mieux-être” (38)? Vue l’envergure de ces questions, il est difficile de ne pas regretter l’absence totale de réponses—fussent-elles hâtives ou soutenues—dans un roman qui se termine subitement sur l’effondrement et l’hébétude. Boise State University (ID) Jason Herbeck RENONÇAY, PHILIPPE. Le défaut du ciel. Paris: Libella, 2012. ISBN 978-2-7529-0594-9. Pp. 134. 15 a. In his fifth novel, Renonçay gives us a polar with an investigative journalist as the protagonist. In search of a former acquaintance who has disappeared, Clovis Bietel sometimes speaks in the first person and sometimes is the subject of an omniscient narrator. Thomas Heller is the object of the search begun by his mother who had read Bietel’s investigative writing and thought that his friendship with her son would provide clues to his whereabouts. The plot of this masterful tale centers on Heller’s link with a former paratrooper in the Indochina war. The veteran, Peter Damian, was Heller’s neighbor and leads Bietel to discover the crime behind the torture and assassination of Damian. In the process, Clovis finds that Damian’s military identity in the Resistance and then in Indochina was associated with the pseudonym Roland Sasre. Both Heller and Clovis return to Vietnam for clues about what Sasre did there. Heller’s mother pays Clovis to find the truth about the strange connection of her son with his neighbor’s fate. Heller traveled to Vietnam and then could not be found after his return. Clovis follows. Heller and Clovis resemble each other to the point where they are even called Siamese twins. As the story proceeds, they in fact become opposite sides of the same coin, that is, a Janus-like pair of acquaintances looking in opposite directions . While Clovis is trying to tie the past to the present, Heller was focused on rewriting the past. As Clovis follows Heller to Vietnam, readers encounter the ambiance of the remnants of colonization, existing without recognition of the American conflict there. Instead, what we have is the French influence, one might even say hegemony , in Indochina. Sasre was not only a soldier in Indochina but a proponent of indigenous self-rule in the face of the invasions by the Vietminh. Clovis tries to find out why Sasre was so committed to this rule. Sasre had many loyal friends who would give eyewitness accounts about his support. These accounts help Clovis explain the mystery of why Sasre changed his identity, effectively partly erasing what he did in Indochina. This change also fascinated Heller who sought to establish the links between Damian and Sasre. The reader becomes involved in interpreting the palimpsest constituted by various documents that are laid out within the narrative, as if they could explain the mystery by themselves. The truths of Heller’s location and the reasons for Damian’s murder are of course intertwined. Along the way, the reader learns that Clovis had a difficult friendship with Heller. Letters from Heller’s mother to Clovis, police records of phone conversations, news reports, eyewitness records all become proofs of what happened , without giving away the deceptiveness of appearances. Clovis probes, and makes errors to be corrected, as his assumptions are either verified or discounted throughout. The zigzag process of trying to make the pieces of the puzzle fit is an Reviews 1301 intriguing method for storytelling and for detective work. There is no linear progression of the plot. Rather the reader moves along as if looking over Clovis’s shoulder at photos, documentary films, and other apparent evidence to piece together the past. There is talent in Renonçay’s writing style. Trinity University (TX) Roland A. Champagne SÉVIGNY, MARIE-ÈVE. Intimité et autres objets fragiles. Montréal: Triptyque, 2012. ISBN 978-2-89031-744-4. Pp. 100. $18 Can. Sévigny’s Intimité may be slight in size, but its short stories are not without a certain moral weight. As the publisher’s insert announces, the stories explore “la frontière entre la vie privée et...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench review→Same topicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts→French-language works237,207→