MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138212374 · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12180

Scale space Radon transform

2021· article· en· W3138212374 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)RadonSpace (punctuation)Radon transformComputer scienceScale spaceRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceGeologyPhysicsCartographyGeographyImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An extension of Radon transform by using a measure function capturing the user need is proposed. The new transform, called scale space Radon transform, is devoted to the case where the embedded shape in the image is not filiform. A case study is brought on a straight line and an ellipse where the SSRT behaviour in the scale space and in the presence of noise is deeply analyzed. In order to show the effectiveness of the proposed transform, the experiments have been carried out, first, on linear and elliptical structures generated synthetically subjected to strong altering conditions such blur and noise and then on structures images issued from real‐world applications such as road traffic, satellite imagery and weld X‐ray imaging. Comparisons in terms of detection accuracy and computational time with well‐known transforms and recent work dedicated to this purpose are conducted, where the proposed transform shows an outstanding performance in detecting the above‐mentioned structures and targeting accurately their spatial locations even in low‐quality images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it