MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138212374 · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12180

Scale space Radon transform

2021· article· en· W3138212374 on OpenAlexaff
Djemel Ziou, Nafaâ Nacereddine, Aïcha Baya Goumeidane

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)RadonSpace (punctuation)Radon transformComputer scienceScale spaceRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceGeologyPhysicsCartographyGeographyImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An extension of Radon transform by using a measure function capturing the user need is proposed. The new transform, called scale space Radon transform, is devoted to the case where the embedded shape in the image is not filiform. A case study is brought on a straight line and an ellipse where the SSRT behaviour in the scale space and in the presence of noise is deeply analyzed. In order to show the effectiveness of the proposed transform, the experiments have been carried out, first, on linear and elliptical structures generated synthetically subjected to strong altering conditions such blur and noise and then on structures images issued from real‐world applications such as road traffic, satellite imagery and weld X‐ray imaging. Comparisons in terms of detection accuracy and computational time with well‐known transforms and recent work dedicated to this purpose are conducted, where the proposed transform shows an outstanding performance in detecting the above‐mentioned structures and targeting accurately their spatial locations even in low‐quality images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Image ProcessingSame topicImage and Object Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207