Impact de l’univers de danse pris en référence par l’enseignant-e d’EPS sur la coéducation des élèves en danse contemporaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La caractérisation de l’activité didactique de quatre professeur-es d’EPS (deux hommes et deux femmes) enseignant la danse contemporaine en contexte mixte permet la mise à jour des contenus réellement enseignés. Ceux-ci, en lien avec les formes et types de communication enseignante font émerger un système d’interactions entre genre des enseignant-e-s et univers de danse pris en référence, qui orientent leur activité didactique. C’est à partir des pratiques filmées et d’entretiens (semi-directif et d’auto confrontation) que sont examinés les effets de l’activité de ces enseignant-e-s sur la coéducation des élèves de collège. Ces études de cas, examinées en danse contemporaine, nuancent les interprétations habituelles concernant l’aspect androcentré des contenus enseignés en EPS et l’espace sexué occupé par les élèves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".