MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138245809 · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/2/25

A semi-analytic model for the study of 1/1 resonant dynamics of the planar elliptic restricted co-orbital problem

2021· article· en· W3138245809 on OpenAlexaff
Miao Li, Yukun Huang, Shengping Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsApsidal precessionEccentricity (behavior)Hamiltonian (control theory)Elliptic orbitMean motionCelestial mechanicsThree-body problemOrbital eccentricityAstrophysicsLibration (molecule)PlanetClassical mechanicsGeometryPoint (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mean motion resonances (MMRs) are widespread in our Solar System. Moreover, resonant dynamics has always been an essential topic in planetary research. Recently, the research about exoplanets and the potential Planet Nine with large eccentricity has given rise to our interests in the secular dynamics inside MMRs in the elliptic model. In this paper, we study the fixed points of the averaged Hamiltonian and the long-term stable regions of the 1/1 resonance (or co-orbital motion) in the elliptic restricted three-body problem (ERTBP) systematically. Numerical integrations prove those test particles trapped in “apsidal co-rotation”, where both the resonant angle ϕ res and the secular angle ⧍ ϖ (or apsidal longitude differences) librate simultaneously, always survive the long-term simulations. Furthermore, utilizing a semianalytical method based on the adiabatic approach, three families of long-term fixed points of the averaged Hamiltonian of the planar ERTBP inside the 1/1 resonance have been found. We call them QS-points, Hpoints, and T-points here, whose values of the ( ϕ res , ⧍ ϖ ) are (0°, 180°), (180°, 0°), and (± 60°, ± 60°), respectively. All the fixed points of the averaged Hamiltonian of the co-orbital motion in the ERTBP are presented in the e - e ′ plane (′ represents the elements of the planet in this paper). We find that QS-points and T-points always exist for the arbitrary eccentricity of a planet, while H-points only exist for the cases of low e ′ and very high e . Furthermore, we measure the libration width in terms of eccentricity, ⧍ e , around these stable equilibrium points in the e -⧍ ϖ phase-space portraits. The “apsidal co-rotation” around all the stable equilibrium points is presented in the e - e ′ plane. All these results are effectively confirmed by numerical experiments. The long-term stable zones around these periodic orbits in the e - e ′ plane are significant for the research of the co-orbital motion in the ERTBP. Above all, these practical approaches that we proposed can also be used to study the secular dynamics of other MMRs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in Astronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207