Sparse channel sampling for ultrasound localization microscopy (SPARSE-ULM)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) has recently enabled the mapping of the cerebral vasculature in vivo with a resolution ten times smaller than the wavelength used, down to ten microns. However, with frame rates up to 20000 frames per second, this method requires large amount of data to be acquired, transmitted, stored, and processed. The transfer rate is, as of today, one of the main limiting factors of this technology. Herein, we introduce a novel reconstruction framework to decrease this quantity of data to be acquired and the complexity of the required hardware by randomly subsampling the channels of a linear probe. Method performance evaluation as well as parameters optimization were conducted in silico using the SIMUS simulation software in an anatomically realistic phantom and then compared to in vivo acquisitions in a rat brain after craniotomy. Results show that reducing the number of active elements deteriorates the signal-to-noise ratio and could lead to false microbubbles detections but has limited effect on localization accuracy. In simulation, the false positive rate on microbubble detection deteriorates from 3.7% for 128 channels in receive and 7 steered angles to 11% for 16 channels and 7 angles. The average localization accuracy ranges from 10.6 μ m and 9.93 μ m for 16 channels/3 angles and 128 channels/13 angles respectively. These results suggest that a compromise can be found between the number of channels and the quality of the reconstructed vascular network and demonstrate feasibility of performing ULM with a reduced number of channels in receive, paving the way for low-cost devices enabling high-resolution vascular mapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".