MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138257635 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.5915

Path decomposition of ruinous behavior for a general Lévy insurance risk process

2011· preprint· en· W3138257635 on OpenAlexaff
Philip S. Griffin, Ross Maller

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLévy processMathematicsConvolution (computer science)Martingale (probability theory)Limit (mathematics)Equivalence (formal languages)Asymptotic distributionLimitingMathematical proofDecompositionRisk modelPath (computing)Applied mathematicsMathematical economicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the general Lévy insurance risk process for Lévy measures in the convolution equivalence class $\mathcal{S}^{(α)}$, $α>0$, via a new kind of path decomposition. This yields a very general functional limit theorem as the initial reserve level $u\to \infty$, and a host of new results for functionals of interest in insurance risk. Particular emphasis is placed on the time to ruin, which is shown to have a proper limiting distribution, as $u\to \infty$, conditional on ruin occurring under our assumptions. Existing asymptotic results under the $\mathcal{S}^{(α)}$ assumption are synthesized and extended, and proofs are much simplified, by comparison with previous methods specific to the convolution equivalence analyses. Additionally, limiting expressions for penalty functions of the type introduced into actuarial mathematics by Gerber and Shiu are derived as straightforward applications of our main results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.073 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207