MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138288887 · doi:10.3390/rs13061123

Fast and Accurate Terrain Image Classification for ASTER Remote Sensing by Data Stream Mining and Evolutionary-EAC Instance-Learning-Based Algorithm

2021· article· en· W3138288887 on OpenAlexaff
Shimin Hu, Simon Fong, Lili Yang, Shuang‐Hua Yang, Nilanjan Dey, Richard Millham, Jinan Fiaidhi

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersGuangdong Provincial Applied Science and Technology Research and Development Program
KeywordsComputer scienceData streamData stream miningData miningAlgorithmMachine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remote sensing streams continuous data feed from the satellite to ground station for data analysis. Often the data analytics involves analyzing data in real-time, such as emergency control, surveillance of military operations or scenarios that change rapidly. Traditional data mining requires all the data to be available prior to inducing a model by supervised learning, for automatic image recognition or classification. Any new update on the data prompts the model to be built again by loading in all the previous and new data. Therefore, the training time will increase indefinitely making it unsuitable for real-time application in remote sensing. As a contribution to solving this problem, a new approach of data analytics for remote sensing for data stream mining is formulated and reported in this paper. Fresh data feed collected from afar is used to approximate an image recognition model without reloading the history, which helps eliminate the latency in building the model again and again. In the past, data stream mining has a drawback in approximating a classification model with a sufficiently high level of accuracy. This is due to the one-pass incremental learning mechanism inherently exists in the design of the data stream mining algorithm. In order to solve this problem, a novel streamlined sensor data processing method is proposed called evolutionary expand-and-contract instance-based learning algorithm (EEAC-IBL). The multivariate data stream is first expanded into many subspaces, and then the subspaces, which are corresponding to the characteristics of the features are selected and condensed into a significant feature subset. The selection operates stochastically instead of deterministically by evolutionary optimization, which approximates the best subgroup. Followed by data stream mining, the model learning for image recognition is done on the fly. This stochastic approximation method is fast and accurate, offering an alternative to the traditional machine learning method for image recognition application in remote sensing. Our experimental results show computing advantages over other classical approaches, with a mean accuracy improvement at 16.62%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207