MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138312792 · doi:10.1177/0894318420987175

More Than Words? Embracing a Practice–Care Distinction for Nursing Practice Education

2021· article· en· W3138312792 on OpenAlexaff
Deborah S. Thoun, Coby Tschanz

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Science Quarterly · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLicensureFlourishingScholarshipNursing practiceNursingNursing researchNurse educationPsychologyMedicineMedical educationPedagogyPolitical scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, authors draw on distinctions between nursing practice and nursing care to inform abstraction and assignment of pre-licensure practice experience hours. Authors discuss an imperative to develop understandings of practice education and practice experience hours that reflect nursing as a basic human science, with implications for the enrichment of student scholarship and flourishing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing Science QuarterlySame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207