The effect of centre volume and procedure location on major complications and mortality from transvenous lead extraction: an ESC EHRA EORP European Lead Extraction ConTRolled ELECTRa registry subanalysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of centre volume and procedure location on major complications and mortality from transvenous lead extraction: an ESC EHRA EORP European Lead Extraction ConTRolled ELECTRa registry subanalysis Hugo-Pierre Racine, Hugo-Pierre Racine Electrophysiology Division, Lead Extraction Program, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec—Université Laval, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0707-884X Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Frédéric Jacques, Frédéric Jacques Cardiac surgery Division, Lead Extraction Program, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec—Université Laval, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-9218 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar François Philippon François Philippon Electrophysiology Division, Lead Extraction Program, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec—Université Laval, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada Corresponding author. Tel: +1 418 656 8711. E-mail address: francois.philippon@fmed.ulaval.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar EP Europace, Volume 23, Issue 7, July 2021, Page 1149, https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab038 Published: 15 March 2021 Article history Received: 22 December 2020 Editorial decision: 01 January 2021 Accepted: 06 February 2021 Published: 15 March 2021
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".