MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138463888 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p375

Abstract P375: Cortical Venous Opacification Patterns and Outcome in Patients With Tandem Carotid Occlusion - Results From the ESCAPE NA1-Trial

2021· article· en· W3138463888 on OpenAlexaff
Martha Marko, Petra Cimflová, Nishita Singh, Johanna M. Ospel, Nima Kashani, Arnuv Mayank, Raul G. Nogueira, Ryan McTaggart, Andrew M. Demchuk, Alexandre Y. Poppe, Michael D. Hill, Bijoy K. Menon, Mayank Goyal, Mohammed Almekhlafi

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOcclusionStroke (engine)PlaceboSurgeryInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The degree of cortical venous opacification could reflect the degree of ischemia in tandem occlusions strokes. We assessed the association between asymmetric cortical vein opacification and outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke and tandem occlusion. Methods: ESCAPE NA1 was a multicenter randomized-controlled trial comparing medical treatments nerinetide vs. placebo in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT. Tandem carotid occlusion was defined as complete occlusion of the ICA on catheter angiography. We assessed cortical venous opacification on baseline CTA using the COVES score (Jansen, et al. Radiology 2019, ranging from 0-6 with lower numbers indicating poor cortical venous filling, and dichotomized to 0 vs. 1-6). The influence of cortical venous opacification on functional outcome was analyzed using regression modelling with adjustment for age, baseline NIHSS and ASPECTS, thrombolysis and treatment allocation. Results: We assessed 115 patients with tandem occlusion. Median COVES score was 2 (IQR 1-3) with 9 patients (8%) scoring 0 (complete absence of cortical venous filling). Patients with COVES 0 were less likely to have good leptomeningeal collaterals (good collaterals: COVES 0: 0/9 (0%) vs. COVES 1-6: 19/102 (18%), p = 0.007). Patients with COVES 0 were less likely to achieve good outcome (mRS 0-2, COVES 0: 3/9 patients (33%) vs. COVES 1-6: 79/106 (74%), p=0.016). Cortical venous filling was significantly associated with good functional outcome on univariable analysis (OR 5.9, 95%CI 1.4 - 25.0), and after adjustment for baseline variables (OR 8.6, 95%CI 1.4 - 51.0). Cervical carotid angioplasty and/or stenting did not modify functional outcome after adjustment for COVES score. Conclusion: Impaired venous drainage is a marker of poor pial collaterals and is associated with poorer outcome in tandem occlusion patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207