Learning spectro-temporal representations of complex sounds with parameterized neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning models have become potential candidates for auditory neuroscience research, thanks to their recent successes in a variety of auditory tasks, yet these models often lack interpretability to fully understand the exact computations that have been performed. Here, we proposed a parametrized neural network layer, which computes specific spectro-temporal modulations based on Gabor filters [learnable spectro-temporal filters (STRFs)] and is fully interpretable. We evaluated this layer on speech activity detection, speaker verification, urban sound classification, and zebra finch call type classification. We found that models based on learnable STRFs are on par for all tasks with state-of-the-art and obtain the best performance for speech activity detection. As this layer remains a Gabor filter, it is fully interpretable. Thus, we used quantitative measures to describe distribution of the learned spectro-temporal modulations. Filters adapted to each task and focused mostly on low temporal and spectral modulations. The analyses show that the filters learned on human speech have similar spectro-temporal parameters as the ones measured directly in the human auditory cortex. Finally, we observed that the tasks organized in a meaningful way: the human vocalization tasks closer to each other and bird vocalizations far away from human vocalizations and urban sounds tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".