MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138539200 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2011.0104

Annie Ernaux: Socio-Ethnographer of Contemporary France ed. by Alison S. Fell, Edward Welch

2011· article· en· W3138539200 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John T. Booker

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesFrenchEthnographyArt historySociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

du texte” (64). “Les Chasses fantastiques, motif récurrent du romanesque corse?” d’Isabelle Casta traite le thème du mazzeru, chasseur fantastique qui tue en rêve un animal, double d’un être humain qui mourra par la suite (73). Dans “De quelques inquiétants loups-garous: pour une définition du fantastique québécois”, Roberto Addino examine dans des contes québécois du dix-neuvième siècle les connotations religieuses et la portée populaire et moralisatrice qui créent un “fantastique didactique, aplati et édulcoré” (148). “La géographie fantastique du post-humain francophone” d’Hervé-Pierre Lambert étudie la version française du post-humain en faisant référence surtout à des œuvres de Michel Houellebecq, Pierre Bordage et Maurice Dantec. Lambert relève aussi bien les caractéristiques spécifiques de la vision francophone de ce motif d’origine nord-américaine que des caractéristiques communes à la tradition dans laquelle il s’inscrit. Dans “White de Marie Darrieussecq ou les géographies du vide”, Philippe analyse trois sortes de géographies: celle des protagonistes, celle des lieux, et celle des “espaces du non-dit ou de déjà dit resté en blanc” (selon la terminologie d’Umberto Eco) (161). Deux articles examinent la littérature chinoise et son influence sur le fantastique français. Le parfois lapidaire “L’intertexte des contes fantastiques chinois chez Segalen, Claudel et Morand” de Jun-Pei Liao discute la présence de motifs communs aux contes chinois dans des œuvres francophones et anglo-saxonnes, tandis que l’étude comparatiste de Roger Bozzetto “Rêves et doubles dans les textes ‘fantastiques’ chinois et français” traite le motif de l’espace onirique, ses relations avec la veille, et ses liens avec le motif du double et de la métamorphose dans les deux traditions littéraires. Eastern Illinois University Kathryn M. Bulver FELL, ALISON S., and EDWARD WELCH, eds. Annie Ernaux: Socio-Ethnographer of Contemporary France. Nottingham French Studies 48.2. ISBN 978-0-8535-8254-0. Pp. 94. $60. In articulating their rationale for this special issue of Nottingham French Studies, Alison Fell and Edward Welch underline two goals: to privilege those texts of Annie Ernaux “in which the focus is more evidently ‘extérieur’” (2) (namely, Journal du dehors and La vie extérieure) and to put into fresh perspective her most recent works (L’usage de la photo and Les années) “by placing them side by side with those of other artists, thinkers, writers, autobiographers and filmmakers who share some of her aesthetic, political and socio-ethnographic concerns ” (3). Interestingly enough, in a brief interview with the editors, Ernaux declares that she does not feel any real sense of affinity with the other figures— Colette, Sophie Calle, Marguerite Duras, Eric Rohmer—proposed by the editors: “ceux que vous citez ne participent pas, ou très peu, de mon ‘horizon de questionnement ’: je veux dire, ceux par rapport auxquels on se confronte, on se situe, ou avec lesquels on entretient un rapport de ‘fraternité’” (8). In her “Raisons d’écrire,” also reproduced in this issue (10–14), Ernaux stresses on the other hand her great admiration for the work of Pierre Bourdieu, whose notion of “confession impersonnelle,” she feels, “me paraît pouvoir définir le mieux mon travail, de façon de plus en plus consciente, à partir de La place” (13). In the first of the contributions by critics, Diana Holmes shows how Colette Reviews 169 and Ernaux, their differences notwithstanding, both project “the strong and pleasurable sense of a ‘real’ woman behind the texts, at once fascinating in her unique life-course and subjectivity, and articulating a reality lived in all the complex ordinariness of the everyday and thus shared with others” (29). Elise HuguenyL éger considers the journal and journalistic writing of Ernaux and Duras, especially La vie extérieure and the latter’s Le monde extérieur, and argues that the two authors ultimately have very different objectives: while Duras “regarde le dehors en espérant y trouver des traces d’elle-même,” Ernaux “espère [...] que les autres trouveront en elle des reflets d’eux-mêmes” (39...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207