The degree of using the smart board in providing students with planning skills to teach Arabic language and their attitudes towards it among the three stages students in Kuwait
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the technological advances that have revolutionized the different fields, the educational processes have been influence too. Smart board is considered as one of the promising approaches to enhance the educational process as approved by many studies. The aim of the current study is to examine the degree of using the smart board in providing students with planning skills to teach Arabic language and their attitudes towards it among the three stages students in Kuwait. This study has used the descriptive analytical approach to fulfill the aims of the study. A validated questionnaire was distributed on (90) students from the three stages in Kuwaiti public schools where the means and standard deviations for their answers were calculated. The results of the current study revealed that the smart board is used in a high degree in providing students with planning skills to teach Arabic language. The results also showed that the students have a positive and good attitude toward using smart board in teaching Arabic language. This study recommends involving smart board in wider classroom management skills and applies such scales on different samples including administrators and teachers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".