Tensor product‐based model transformation approach to tower crane systems modeling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents the application of the tensor product (TP)‐based model transformation approach to produce Tower CRrane (TCR) systems models. The modeling approach starts with a nonlinear model of TCR systems as representative multi‐input–multi‐output controlled processes. A linear parameter‐varying model is next derived, and the modeling steps specific to TP–based model transformation are proceeded to obtain the TP model. The TP model is tested on TCR laboratory equipment in two open‐loop scenarios considering chirp signals and pseudorandom binary step signals applied to the three model inputs (control inputs). The nonlinear and TP model outputs in the two scenarios are the payload position, the cart position, and the arm angular position. The nonlinear and TP model outputs are collected, measured, and compared. The simulation results prove that the derived TP model approximately mimics the behavior of the nonlinear model; both system responses and numerical approximation errors are illustrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it