MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract P06: Anticancer agent 3-deazauridine has the potential to be effective against COVID-19 due to its inhibition of replication of RNA viruses

2021· article· en· W3138826270 on OpenAlexaff
Richard L. Momparler

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNAIn vitroViral replicationMechanism of actionPharmacologyRNA polymeraseBiologyNucleoside analoguePolymeraseVirologyNucleosideVirusEnzymeCancer researchChemistryBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract 3-Deazauridine (3DU) is a nucleoside analogue that was investigated for its antineoplastic activity in cancer patients. 3DU after its phosphorylation in cells to its 5’-triphosphate is a potent inhibitor of CTP synthetase. Inhibition of this enzyme results in a reduction in cellular CTP and inhibition of RNA synthesis. This action of 3DU can also inhibit RNA synthesis since the viral RNA polymerase requires CTP for replication of RNA. 3DU was reported to inhibit the in vitro replication of the RNA influenza virus at concentrations in the range of 40 µM (1) and should also have the potential to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2. In a pilot clinical study, we treated a patient with acute lymphoid leukemia with 3DU at doses ranging from 120 to 360 mg/kg using a continuous intravenous infusion ranging from 40 to 72 hr. (2). The objective of the study was to determine if 3DU could enhance the antileukemic action of the inhibitor of DNA methylation, decitabine, and overcome the problem of drug resistance to this deoxycytidine analogue. Partial responses were observed indicating that pharmacological action of 3DU could accomplish this objective. There were minimal signs of toxicity in this clinical study on 3DU which exhibited plasma concentrations of this analogue in the range that inhibit RNA virus replication. This observation suggests that it would be safe to use 3DU in patients with COVID-19. 3DU has a rapid onset of action with a significant sign of antineoplastic action observable after a 4 h in vitro treatment of human leukemic cells. This pharmacological property rapid action of 3DU may be very important in patients with advanced COVID-19 to inhibit the virus is during its rapid replication phase and prevent progression of the disease to acute lung inflammation. It would be interesting to test this hypothesis in advanced COVID-19 patients at high risk for disease progression. For an initial pilot study I recommend a 36 h infusion of 3DU at a total dose of 120 mg/kg. It is possible that therapy with 3DU may have the potential to rescue patients with advance COVID-19. References 1. Shannon, W.M., Arnett, G., Schabel, F.M., Jr., 1972. 3-Deazauridine: inhibition of ribonucleic acid virus-induced cytopathogenic effects in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2, 159–163. 2. Raynal, N.J., Momparler, L.F., Rivard, G.E., Momparler, R.L., 2011. 3-Deazauridine enhances the antileukemic action of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and targets drug-resistance due to deficiency in deoxycytidine kinase. Leuk. Res. 35, 10-118. Citation Format: Richard Momparler. Anticancer agent 3-deazauridine has the potential to be effective against COVID-19 due to its inhibition of replication of RNA viruses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr P06.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicRNA modifications and cancer→French-language works237,207→