MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138843675 · doi:10.47946/rnera.v0i27.3139

CONSOLIDAÇÃO DA HEGEMONIA DAS CORPORAÇÕES, MONOPOLIZAÇÃO DO TERRITÓRIO E ACUMULAÇÃO POR ESPOLIAÇÃO: O CASO DA CARGILL NO BRASIL E NA ARGENTINA (Consolidation of corporation's hegemony, territory's monopolization and acumulation for dispossession...)

2015· article· pt· W3138843675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA NERA · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesHegemonyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho tem o objetivo de elucidar algumas das transformações ocorridas no campo do Brasil e da Argentina a partir da década de 1970, por meio da análise do estabelecimento do que chamamos regime alimentar corporativo, mais especificamente no que se refere ao segmento de grãos e óleos, e seus impactos no desenvolvimento geográfico desigual do capitalismo em ambos países. Fizemos isso focando nas estratégias de territorialização da Cargill, empresa com forte presença em ambos os países, e buscamos ver o que elas nos revelam acerca da estruturação do regime alimentar corporativo. Uma das hipóteses averiguadas foi a de que com o advento do neoliberalismo houve a consolidação e aprofundamento da hegemonia das corporações do setor agroalimentar. É sobre isso que trataremos no presente artigo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it