MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138904072 · doi:10.22323/1.390.0227

Beyond Standard Model Physics at the LHeC and the FCC-eh

2021· article· en· W3138904072 on OpenAlexaff
G. Azuelos, M. D’Onofrio, Oliver Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 40th International Conference on High Energy physics — PoS(ICHEP2020) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsPhysics beyond the Standard ModelSupersymmetryLarge Hadron ColliderHiggs bosonStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Sensitivity (control systems)Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thanks to the low background, negligible pileup and generally clean environement at ep colliders, a rich program of physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) can be explored with precision measurements, complementing searches at LHC and future pp colliders. We review some recent studies aimed at evaluating the reach and sensitivity of the next generation ep colliders, the LHeC and FCC-eh, in probing a few BSM models, in particular compressed scenarios of supersymmetry, long-lived particles and dark sector, charged Higgs and leptoquarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 40th International Conference on High Energy physics — PoS(ICHEP2020)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207