Fault detection and diagnosis for PZT sensors with electro-mechanical impedance technique by using one-dimensional convolutional autoencoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) sensors are widely used in various structural health monitoring (SHM) applications, where data acquired by the PZT sensors are used for damage detection. Any failure of the PZT sensors will have a detrimental effect in the ability of SHM systems to detect damage. Therefore, detecting faulty PZT sensor is critical to reduce any false-calls associated with malfunctioning sensor to ensure proper functionality of SHM systems. This paper proposes a self-diagnostic method to monitoring the health of PZT sensors using the electro-mechanical impedance (EMI) data in two steps. In the first detection step, the onedimensional convolutional autoencoder (1D-CAE) is employed to obtain the reconstruction error as anomaly scores from the raw EMI data. Hence, the faulty PZT sensors can be detected by comparing the anomaly score with a pre-defined threshold. In the second diagnostic step, the data feature is first extracted with the 1D-CAE. The extracted feature is then fed into a multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier to classify the fault type of the PZT sensor. The proposed method was validated through experiments, where typical in-service induced damages such as impact, environmental effect, sensor breakage localized high temperature heating, etc. were introduced. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for both detection and diagnosis of various types of PZT sensor damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".