Building Instance Extraction Method Based on Improved Hybrid Task Cascade
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automatic building extraction from remote sensing imagery is crucial to urban construction and management. To address the main challenges of diverse building scale and appearance, this letter proposes an automatic building instance extraction method based on an improved hybrid task cascade (HTC). Our method consists of three components by obtaining high-resolution representation, defining guided anchor, and forming focal loss to boost the adaptability of automatic building instance extraction. Comprehensive experimental results on WHU aerial building data set demonstrated that compared with the mainstream Mask R-CNN method, our method increased AP and AR in bounding box branch and mask branch by 9.8%–6.5% and 10.7%–8.0% respectively, especially AP <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$_{S}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and AP <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$_{L}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> in the two branches by 10.1%–6.9% and 3.4%–2.4%, respectively. We evaluated the effectiveness and complexity of these components separately and discussed the universality and practicability of deep learning method in automatic building extraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it