MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ECG Cardiac arrhythmias Classification using DWT, ICA and MLP Neural Networks

2021· article· en· W3139031041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer sciencePreprocessorBeat (acoustics)Cardiac arrhythmiaArtificial neural networkPerceptronIndependent component analysisCardiologyMedicineAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recognizing ECG cardiac arrhythmia automatically is an essential task for diagnosing the abnormalities of cardiac muscle. The proposal of few algorithms has been made for classifying the ECG cardiac arrhythmias, however the system of classification efficiency is determined on the basis of its prediction and diagnosis accuracy. Hence, in this study the proposal of an efficient system has been made for classifying the ECG cardiac arrhythmia as an expertise. Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) is being utilized for the preprocessing mechanism of ECG signal, Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is being utilized for dimensionality reduction and Feature Extraction process of ECG signal and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network is being utilized for performing the task of classification. As an outcome of classification, the results have been acquired on categorizing Normal Beats under the class of Non-Ectopic beat, Atrial Premature Beat under the class of Supra-Ventricular ectopic beat and Ventricular Escape beat under the class of Ventricular ectopic beat on the basis of standardization given by ANSI/AAMI EC57: 1998. For the acquisition of ECG signal, MIT-BIH physionet arrhythmia database is being utilized in this study added to that its being utilized for training process and testing process of the classifier on the basis of MLP-NN. The results obtained from the simulation has been inferred that the accuracy of classification of the proposed algorithm is 96.50% on utilizing 10 files inclusive of normal beats, Atrial Premature Beat and Ventricular Escape beat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it