Dedifferentiation in Breast Metastasis of Endometrial Carcinoma: A Diagnostic Dilemma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most breast tumors are primary to this site; breast metastasis of endometrial origin is extremely rare. Low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinomas can undergo dedifferentiation to undifferentiated carcinoma but such transformation at a metastatic site has been reported previously in only 2 cases. We report a case of dedifferentiation occurring in an isolated solitary breast metastasis of a low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. A 64-yr-old woman presented with a breast mass 2 yr after initial diagnosis of a grade 1 FIGO stage IIIA endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound guided biopsy of the breast mass showed a grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma which was diffusely estrogen receptor and PAX8-positive, consistent with metastasis from the previous endometrial carcinoma. The tumor initially responded to Letrozole therapy but then abruptly increased in size. Mastectomy revealed a poorly differentiated malignant tumor with morphology and immunophenotype (including loss of ARID1A and ARID1B immunoreactivity) consistent with undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma with no residual low-grade component. Awareness of the phenomenon of dedifferentiation of endometrial carcinoma in a metastatic site is important to avoid misdiagnosis as a primary breast cancer or metastasis from another primary site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".