MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3139181639 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10501280.1

Modelling large-scale seasonal variations in water table depth over tropical peatlands in Riau, Sumatra

2019· article· en· W3139181639 on OpenAlexaff
Symon Mezbahuddin, Tadas Nikonovas, Allan Spessa, R. F. Grant, Muhammad Imron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater tablePeatTable (database)Environmental scienceScale (ratio)TropicsHydrology (agriculture)ClimatologyGeologyGeographyGroundwaterEcologyCartographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water table depth (WTD) is the predominant biophysical control over the occurrence of peat and forest fires in tropical peatlands. In Indonesia, prolonged droughts caused by El-Niño and/or positive Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), exacerbated by extensive peat drainage for agriculture and plantation establishment, can promote severe peatland fires by lowering WTD and hence desiccating surface and sub-surface peats. The severe drought episode of late 2015 across Indonesia, caused by a strong El Nino and a positive IOD, led to a major and damaging increase in peatland fires, highlighting an urgent need to develop operational systems to forecast potentially severe fire events to mitigate the impacts of fire and haze. The 2002 ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution, signed and ratified by a total of 10 ASEAN states, including Indonesia, identifies a critical need for such systems based on near-time climate projections. However, such systems have not yet been developed. While an operational early warning system for forecasting dangerous burning conditions in Indonesia is currently within reach using state-of-the-art modelling tools, such as the ECMWF’s System 5 seasonal forecast model (SEAS5), development is still hampered by insufficient knowledge about the influence of fluctuations in peat moisture on fire, particularly during periods of extreme drought. The main objectives of this study were: i) to deploy a process-based ecosystem model “ecosys” to study how WTD and peat moisture profiles change in tropical peatlands across Riau province, Sumatra, in response to drought and land cover change, focusing on the 2015 drought; and ii) to examine whether those changes could have been predicted using SEAS5. Model spin-up from 2008-2014 was driven by inputs from ECMWF’s climate reanalysis data (ERA5), followed by 3 parallel simulations for 2015, driven by ERA5, ERA5 climatology, and SEAS5 hindcasts. Model outputs of peat moisture profiles and WTD showed how peat moisture and WTD were significantly affected by weather and land uses during the dry season of 2015 which were corroborated well against data from Soil Moisture Active Passive satellite and site-level monitoring networks. Our work is a pioneering attempt to perform large-scale process-based modelling to predict seasonal variations in tropical peatland WTD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology→French-language works237,207→