MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139190786 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.201171

Cutting the “Gordian Knot” — Cardiac Involvement in Primary Sjögren Syndrome

2021· editorial· en· W3139190786 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
George Markousis‐Mavrogenis, Sophie Mavrogeni

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionKnot (papermaking)DiseaseContext (archaeology)SurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sjögren syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disease typically characterized by inflammatory involvement of the exocrine glands1. The association of SS with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including manifestations such as stroke and myocardial infarction has been demonstrated by numerous previous studies1. Bringing classical CVD risk factors under control through appropriate therapeutic interventions has traditionally been the primary approach that has been reiterated in most practice guidelines regarding the prevention of CVD in patients with SS2. Yet, it would appear that these measures are not adequate by themselves to halt progression to CVD in these patients, as demonstrated by previous epidemiologic evidence3. It would thus appear that more mechanisms that are as of yet unaccounted for play an important role in this context. This complex conundrum is reminiscent of the ancient Greek legend of the “Gordian knot,” a knot tied by Gordius, the king of Phrygia, rumored to be impossible to untie except … Address correspondence to Prof. Dr. S.I. Mavrogeni, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Leof. Andrea Siggrou 356, Kallithea 17674, Athens, Greece. Email: sophie.mavrogeni{at}gmail.com.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicSalivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsFrench-language works237,207