Chemiresistive Gas Sensors Based on Hollow Heterojunction: A Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chemiresistive gas sensors are widely used in tens of thousands of applications, from health and safety to energy efficiency and emission control. Fabrication of highly effective sensing materials is of great significance for the practical applications in efficient gas detection. Among numerous sensing materials, semiconductor‐based sensing materials with hollow and heterojunction structures demonstrate distinct advantages such as high sensitivity, low operating temperature, and fast response/recovery. In this paper, the mechanism of gas sensing by chemiresistive sensors, as well as the mechanisms responsible for enhanced sensing performance in hollow structure and heterojunction are reviewed. Both single‐shelled and multi‐shelled hollow heterojunction materials applied in gas detection are presented. Then, the design and application of open hollow heterojunction in gas sensing are discussed. This review provides a deeper understanding of innovative works on the material design of high‐performance sensing materials for gas detection. It also summarizes the key technical challenges in material development and points out the perspectives for future studies on the next generating of chemiresistive gas sensing materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it