MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139289063 · doi:10.1038/s41420-021-00441-z

Islet neogenesis associated protein (INGAP) protects pancreatic β cells from IL-1β and IFNγ-induced apoptosis

2021· article· en· W3139289063 on OpenAlexafffund
Eni Nano, Maria Petropavlovskaia, Lawrence Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Death Discovery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersFondation de l'Hôpital général juifJewish General Hospital
KeywordsNeogenesisApoptosisIsletCell biologyPancreatic isletsChemistryEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyMedicineDiabetes mellitusBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Ingap-p), protect β cells against cytokine-induced death. INGAP has been shown to induce islet neogenesis in diabetic animals, to stimulate β-cell proliferation and differentiation, and to improve islet survival and function. Importantly, Ingap-p has shown promising results in clinical trials for diabetes (phase I/II). However, the full potential of INGAP and its mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. Using rat insulinoma cells RINm5F and INS-1 treated with interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), we demonstrate here that both rINGAP and Ingap-p inhibit apoptosis, Caspase-3 activation, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and nitric oxide (NO) production, and explore the related signaling pathways. As expected, IL-1β induced nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), p38, and JNK signaling, whereas interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) activated the JAK2/STAT1 pathway and potentiated the IL-1β effects. Both rINGAP and Ingap-p decreased phosphorylation of IKKα/β, IkBα, and p65, although p65 nuclear translocation was not inhibited. rINGAP, used for further analysis, also inhibited STAT3, p38, and JNK activation. Interestingly, all inhibitory effects of rINGAP were observed for the cytokine cocktail, not IL-1β alone, and were roughly equal to reversing the potentiating effects of INFγ. Furthermore, rINGAP had no effect on IL-1β/NF-κB-induced gene expression (e.g., Ccl2, Sod2) but downregulated several IFNγ-stimulated (Irf1, Socs1, Socs3) or IFNγ-potentiated (Nos2) genes. This, however, was observed again only for the cytokine cocktail, not IFNγ alone, and rINGAP did not inhibit the IFNγ-induced JAK2/STAT1 activation. Together, these intriguing results suggest that INGAP does not target either IL-1β or IFNγ individually but rather inhibits the signaling crosstalk between the two, the exact mechanism of which remains to be investigated. In summary, our study characterizes the anti-inflammatory effects of INGAP, both protein and peptide, and suggests a new therapeutic utility for INGAP in the treatment of diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Death DiscoverySame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207