MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139313698 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2010.0013

Between Languages and Cultures: Colonial and Postcolonial Readings of Gabrielle Roy by Rosemary Chapman

2010· article· en· W3139313698 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Émile J. Talbot

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

pour elles de s’entraider. Rencontres essentielles soulève d’autres aspects de la question, par exemple la place que tient la maternité dans la vie d’une femme et la manière d’agir face à l’inconstance masculine, mais surtout il propose que la femme assure sa propre subsistance. Dans ses œuvres, Liking attaque le christianisme pour avoir relégué la femme au second plan. A cette fin, elle se réfère à la littérature orale et au mythe de Soo, la femme originelle chez les Bassa. Elle suggère aussi que la femme a droit à l’amour et à choisir son partenaire, notions révolutionnaires dans une société où le groupe familial décide des alliances. Beyala continue sur cette voie. Elle insiste sur la complémentarité du couple et elle développe son concept personnel du féminisme. Quant à Bassek, à travers le rituel de “l’anlu” et la difficile question de l’avortement, elle montre que les femmes peuvent résister aux exigences masculines arbitraires. Ces analyses parfois plus culturelles que littéraires offrent des informations fort précieuses sur la société moderne, mais aussi sur la créativité féminine même dans les circonstances difficiles d’aujourd’hui. Kansas State University Claire L. Dehon CHAPMAN, ROSEMARY. Between Languages and Cultures: Colonial and Postcolonial Readings of Gabrielle Roy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP, 2009. ISBN 978-0-7735-3496-4. Pp. 308. $85.00 Can. Rosemary Chapman has written a well-researched, sensitive appraisal of Gabrielle Roy’s lifelong attempt to understand the various cultures that constitute Canada’s ethnic composition and to situate herself within that dynamic. Chapman sees Roy’s representations of Francophones, Anglophones, immigrants, métis, and indigenous peoples as an attempt to explore different modes of belonging, in short, to “write Canada.” The book is remarkable for the range of its inquiry, covering journalistic pieces, fiction, and autobiographical writings (including some unpublished material) and for the fresh light it sheds on issues central to much of Roy’s œuvre. The author begins with a searching discussion of Roy’s bicultural education in Manitoba followed by a reflection on her experience as a teacher of multiethnic students. Chapman’s archival research at the Fonds de l’association des Canadiens français du Manitoba, as well as at the Manitoba provincial archives, encompasses a careful review of curricula, textbooks, teachers’ manuals and other pertinent information relevant to Roy’s formative years. While this analysis concentrates primarily, though not exclusively, on the Francophone Manitobans in the early twentieth century, particularly in the wake of the abolition of bilingual schools in 1916, which made teaching in French illegal, it raises broader issues of linguistic and cultural hierarchy. Chapman discusses how education, seen in imperial situations as a tool of colonial governance, was used to direct all Manitoban children to view the world through the categories of the Anglo-Canadian elite. The author examines how a peculiar form of cultural resistance led to the establishment of a Francophone confessional system within the official school system, in contravention of the law, but sometimes with the knowledge of school inspectors. This dual system was in place during Roy’s final school years and then during her tenure as a teacher, creating an experience that sensitized her to issues of cultural survival and hybridity. Using this understanding of Roy’s Reviews 155 experience allows Chapman to contribute significant insights into Roy’s fictional and autobiographical narratives, especially those that feature a school teacher. Likewise, the author’s important discussion of La Détresse et l’enchantement, in which she focuses on Roy’s identity as a colonized subject, including her sense of linguistic exclusion (also experienced in Paris), draws on the analysis of the Manitoban formation. Always attentive to the representation of the unequal power relations between languages, Roy brought to her fiction and journalistic writings a clear sympathy for allophone immigrants and native peoples, including the Inuit. As Chapman observes, in Roy’s writing, the characters most marginalized by the dominant language tend to be allophone rather than Francophone. The focus of Roy’s reflection is not primarily the marginalization of French speakers but rather the condition...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207