A Multistage Passive Islanding Detection Method for Synchronous-Based Distributed Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multistage approach to passive islanding detection is proposed that utilizes a decision tree (DT) like classification algorithm. The novelty of the proposed method is centered on the way in which features are passed to subsequent stages of the DT. Feature sets extracted using different sized time windows are passed to successive stages of the tree. This provides two important advantages: 1) cases that can be easily determined as either islanding or nonislanding events are flagged as soon as possible without waiting for the full feature set to become available; 2) because the algorithm allows for the use of different sized time windows, features are analyzed in time-scales that fit their natural patterns of temporal evolution. In this article, the proposed classifier is trained and tested using a database of feature vectors, obtained using PSCAD, which were designed to reflect a variety of commonly encountered events on an IEEE 34-bus distribution system. One of the key requirements for the proposed algorithm was that easy cases should be flagged as soon as possible; this property was confirmed by the observation that most events ($\approx$79%) were detected within 10–20 ms, while at the same time retaining a very high detection rate overall cases ($>\!99$%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".