MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139376310 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.024019

Optical properties of an extended gravitational lens

2021· article· en· W3139376310 on OpenAlexaff
Slava G. Turyshev, Viktor T. Toth

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsOttawa Public Health
FundersCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCaustic (mathematics)Multipole expansionPhysicsGravitational fieldEikonal equationField (mathematics)GravitationGravitational waveGravitational lensGravitational accelerationElectromagnetic fieldOpticsClassical mechanicsAstrophysicsQuantum mechanicsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We continue to study the optical properties of the solar gravitational lens (SGL). The aim is prospective applications of the SGL for imaging purposes. We investigate the solution of Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic (EM) field, obtained on the background of a static gravitational field of the Sun. We now treat the Sun as an extended body with a gravitational field that can be described using an infinite series of gravitational multipole moments. Studying the propagation of monochromatic EM waves in this extended solar gravitational field, we develop a wave-optical treatment of the SGL that allows us to study the caustics formed in an image plane in the SGL's strong interference region. We investigate the EM field in several important regions, namely, (i) the area in the inner part of the caustic and close to the optical axis, (ii) the region outside the caustic, and (iii) the region in the immediate vicinity of the caustic, especially around its cusps and folds. We show that in the first two regions the physical behavior of the EM field may be understood using the method of stationary phase. However, in the immediate vicinity of the caustic, the method of stationary phase is inadequate, and a wave-optical treatment is necessary. Relying on the angular eikonal method, we develop a new approach to describe the EM field accurately in all regions, including the immediate vicinity of the caustics and especially near the cusps and folds. The method allows us to investigate the EM field in this important region, which is characterized by rapidly oscillating behavior. Our results are new and can be used to describe gravitational lensing by realistic astrophysical objects, such as stars, spiral, and elliptical galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207