A Revista do Homem (Playboy) e a censura prévia na ditadura militar (1975-1976): entre a moral, os bons costumes e o homem contemporâneo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO A Revista do Homem, atualmente revista Playboy, surge na década de 1970, um período conturbado para os meios de comunicação no Brasil. Pois, desde 1968, com a instituição do AI-5, a censura era um dos meios utilizados pelo regime ditatorial para o controle de opiniões e, segundo seu discurso, preservação da família à luz da moral e dos bons costumes. Sendo uma revista erótica, seu conteúdo teve que passar pelo crivo da censura oficial, tendo seu conteúdo afetado pelos cortes impostos. O objetivo deste artigo é compreender como os censores avaliavam o conteúdo veiculado n’A Revista do Homem e qual o impacto da censura prévia em suas edições. Esta pesquisa descritiva e histórica com análise documental de 122 pareceres da censura buscou entender as minúcias do processo censório no período estudado. Conclui-se que apesar do esforço da DCDP no controle moral, existia certa permissividade, principalmente pelo entendimento de certos censores de que a revista tinha um público bem definido.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".