MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139406935 · doi:10.1590/2237-101x02204610

A Revista do Homem (Playboy) e a censura prévia na ditadura militar (1975-1976): entre a moral, os bons costumes e o homem contemporâneo

2021· article· pt· W3139406935 on OpenAlexaff
Raphael Diego Greenhalgh, Carlos Henrique Juvêncio

Bibliographic record

VenueTopoi (Rio de Janeiro) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian cultural history and politics
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO A Revista do Homem, atualmente revista Playboy, surge na década de 1970, um período conturbado para os meios de comunicação no Brasil. Pois, desde 1968, com a instituição do AI-5, a censura era um dos meios utilizados pelo regime ditatorial para o controle de opiniões e, segundo seu discurso, preservação da família à luz da moral e dos bons costumes. Sendo uma revista erótica, seu conteúdo teve que passar pelo crivo da censura oficial, tendo seu conteúdo afetado pelos cortes impostos. O objetivo deste artigo é compreender como os censores avaliavam o conteúdo veiculado n’A Revista do Homem e qual o impacto da censura prévia em suas edições. Esta pesquisa descritiva e histórica com análise documental de 122 pareceres da censura buscou entender as minúcias do processo censório no período estudado. Conclui-se que apesar do esforço da DCDP no controle moral, existia certa permissividade, principalmente pelo entendimento de certos censores de que a revista tinha um público bem definido.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopoi (Rio de Janeiro)Same topicBrazilian cultural history and politicsFrench-language works237,207