MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3139421235 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p330

Abstract P330: Optimizing Predictions of Infarct Core Using Machine Learning

2021· article· en· W3139421235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rania Abdelkhaleq, Victor Lopez‐Rivera, Sergio Salazar‐Marioni, Songmi Lee, Youngran Kim, Luca Giancardo, Ivan Coronado, Muhammad Bilal Tariq, Swapnil Khose, Jerome Jeevarajan, Mahan Shahrivari, Sean I. Savitz, Louise D. McCullough, Sunil A. Sheth

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Perfusion scanningOcclusionRadiologyGold standard (test)Nuclear medicineComputed tomographyPerfusionSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Evaluation of infarct core by advanced neuroimaging has facilitated patient selection for endovascular stroke therapy (EST), however the accuracy of machine-learning analysis compared to these modalities remains unexplored. We test the performance of computed tomography-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (CT- ASPECTS) vs. Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP)-RAPID, vs. an extension of our novel machine-learning model, Deep Symmetry-sensitive Network (DeepSymNet [ref]), using the final infarct volume (FIV) in patients with rapid and successful endovascular reperfusion as the gold standard. Methods and Materials: We identified consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke that underwent EST with TICI 2b/3 reperfusion. FIV was determined by volumetric measurements on 24-48h DWI MRI. The DeepSymNet algorithm combines symmetric and absolute brain representations and had been trained to predict CTP-RAPID core size from CTA source images acquired at presentation. Performance at predicting FIV was determined by Pearson’s correlation for CT- ASPECTS, CTP-RAPID, and DeepSymNet. Data are presented as median [IQR]. Results: Among the 76 patients that met inclusion criteria, 55.2% were male, the median age was 68 years [54-77], and 32.8% were White. 71% of the patients demonstrated an MCA occlusion, and 55% of all occlusions were left-sided. Median ASPECTS on presentation was 8 [7-8.5] and the median FIV was 10 mL [2-37]. ASPECTS, CTP-RAPID and DeepSymNet all correlated with FIV, with comparable performances from ASPECTS (R 2 =-0.398) and CTP-RAPID (R 2 =0.403) and superior performance by DeepSymNet (R 2 =-0.606)(Table). Conclusions: The DeepSymNet machine learning model analyzing CTA source images demonstrated superior performance to ASPECTS and CTP-RAPID in FIV prediction. These findings suggest machine learning models may provide improved predictions of infarct core and selection for EST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→