MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139445898 · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100377

Self-adjusting anode catalyst layer for smart water management in anion exchange membrane fuel cells

2021· article· en· W3139445898 on OpenAlexaff
Junfeng Zhang, Yang Liu, Weikang Zhu, Yabiao Pei, Yan Yin, Yanzhou Qin, Xianguo Li, Michael D. Guiver

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Physical Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin-Science and Technology Correspondent ProjectState Key Laboratory of EnginesNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin City
KeywordsAnodeCatalysisMembraneChemical engineeringLayer (electronics)DiffusionProton exchange membrane fuel cellMoistureMaterials scienceFuel cellsHomogeneousIon exchangeCLs upper limitsChemistryIonElectrodeComposite materialEngineeringOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water management in the anode catalyst layer (ACL) during fuel cell operation is of importance to the performance of anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs). Until now, only a few methods, such as controlling external conditions and adjusting other components like the gas diffusion layer (GDL), attempt to indirectly regulate water content within the ACL. Here, we report a self-regulating ACL having stratified, gradient pore sizes from 8 nm (membrane side) to 150 nm (GDL side). Self-regulating moisture behavior was observed for the gradient ACL, constituted individually of Pt/C layer and PtRu/C layer, which was distinctly different than that from catalyst layers (CLs) composed of homogeneous catalysts (Pt/C CL, PtRu/C CL, and mixed CL). The results of this study are anticipated to give an insight into the design of CLs with smart structures for improving AEMFC performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Reports Physical ScienceSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207