MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139453788 · doi:10.1177/2333794x21999155

Providing Home-Based Support for Children with Chronic Conditions in an Urban Slum: Experiences from a Community-Based Palliative Care Program in Bangladesh

2021· article· en· W3139453788 on OpenAlexaff
Mostofa Kamal Chowdhury, Khadija Shopna, Anisha Lynch‐Godrei, Mehr Jain, Nadia Farheen, Noorjahan Begum, Nezamuddin Ahmad, Megan Doherty

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Pediatric Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePalliative careFamily medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the palliative care needs of children with chronic conditions and their caregivers in an urban slum in Bangladesh. In this cross-sectional study, we interviewed 25 caregivers whose children receive support from a community-based program lead by community health workers, that provides medication, medical supplies, food, caregiver training, and psychological support free of charge. The chronic conditions of children in the program included cerebral palsy (80%), congenital heart disease (8%), neurodegenerative conditions (4%), cancer (4%), and intellectual disabilities (4%). Common symptoms included cough or breathing problems (64%), fever (56%), and pain (56%). Most caregivers (96%) reported they were unable to do any paid work due to their child's needs and in all families, the child's condition had a significant impact on their financial situation. Community-based palliative care programs can be developed to support children with chronic conditions who may not access care from acute care facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Pediatric HealthSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207