MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139483492 · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004124

Impact of social isolation on mortality and morbidity in 20 high-income, middle-income and low-income countries in five continents

2021· article· en· W3139483492 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryo Naito, Darryl P. Leong, Shrikant I. Bangdiwala, Martin McKee, S. V. Subramanian, Sumathy Rangarajan, Shofiqul Islam, Álvaro Avezum, Karen Yeates, Scott A. Lear, Rajeev Gupta, Afzalhussein Yusufali, Antonio L Dans, Andrzej Szuba, Khalid F. AlHabib, Manmeet Kaur, Omar Rahman, Pamela Serón, Rafael Díaz, Thandi Puoane, Weida Liu, Yibing Zhu, Yundong Sheng, Patricio López‐Jaramillo, Jephat Chifamba, Kubilay Karşıdağ, Roya Kelishadi, Annika Rosengren, Rasha Khatib, Leela Itty Amma K R, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Global Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityImpactHamilton Health SciencesPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersFaculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western CapePhilippine Council for Health Research and DevelopmentCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUnited Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine RefugeesIndependent University, BangladeshServierUniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Slaskich we WroclawiuDairy Farmers of CanadaUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaAstraZenecaMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoAFA FörsäkringSaudi Heart AssociationUniversiti Teknologi MARANational Research FoundationNorth-West UniversityPublic Health Agency of CanadaDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)McMaster UniversitySanofiMedical Research CouncilKing Saud UniversityIndian Council of Medical ResearchHamilton Health SciencesInternational Development Research CentreVetenskapsrådetHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareUniversidad de La FronteraPublic Health AgencyGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsSocial isolationDemographyPopulationMedicineGerontologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between social isolation and mortality and incident diseases in middle-aged adults in urban and rural communities from high-income, middle-income and low-income countries. DESIGN: Population-based prospective observational study. SETTING: Urban and rural communities in 20 high income, middle income and low income. PARTICIPANTS: 119 894 community-dwelling middle-aged adults. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations of social isolation with mortality, cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death and incident diseases. RESULTS: Social isolation was more common in middle-income and high-income countries compared with low-income countries, in urban areas than rural areas, in older individuals and among women, those with less education and the unemployed. It was more frequent among smokers and those with a poorer diet. Social isolation was associated with greater risk of mortality (HR of 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.36), incident stroke (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.40), cardiovascular disease (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.25) and pneumonia (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.37), but not cancer. The associations between social isolation and mortality were observed in populations in high-income, middle-income and low-income countries (HR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.32 to 2.17), 1.27 (1.15 to 1.40) and 1.47 (1.25 to 1.73), respectively, interaction p=0.02). The HR associated with social isolation was greater in men than women and in younger than older individuals. Mediation analyses for the association between social isolation and mortality showed that unhealthy behaviours and comorbidities may account for about one-fifth of the association. CONCLUSION: Social isolation is associated with increased risk of mortality in countries at different economic levels. The increasing share of older people in populations in many countries argues for targeted strategies to mitigate its adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Global HealthSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207