MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139536423 · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1898573

Twelve tips for adapting grand rounds for contemporary demands

2021· article· en· W3139536423 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Teacher · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConferences and Exhibitions Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Grand ChallengesOrder (exchange)Best practiceCase presentationMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grand rounds have evolved since inception in the early 1900s and subsequently, there has been a continual debate surrounding the best purpose for the time-honoured event. However, the purpose of grand rounds can be broadened to meet the needs of the medical community today, especially at a time where there is great distribution of medical practitioners and learners geographically and events such as COVID-19, which prevent the community from physically gathering. Using the evidence and lessons available from the literature we developed a grand rounds series with goals and objectives suited to our context. In this guide we provide twelve tips covering goal planning, logistics, presentation preparation and presentation delivery in order to illustrate how one could organize an informed grand rounds which is successful contextually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical TeacherSame topicConferences and Exhibitions ManagementFrench-language works237,207