Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is devoted to Stepan Bandera (1909-1959). S. Bandera is a remarkable person and a leading figure in the Ukrainian liberation movement. He was the leader of OUN (Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists) and wrote many articles dealing with socio-political issues both in Ukraine and among Ukrainian exiles from 1940-1950. His publications and ideological teachings became the foundation for the ongoing development of OUN. The spread of Ukrainian nationalism and its increasing popularity among the people under S. Bandera's leadership became a phenomenon, and the enemies of Ukraine identified the whole liberation movement with his name. S. Bandera included international issues and relations in all his works. This was of the utmost importance to the Ukrainian people and the whole liberation movement because it responded to the negative image of Ukrainian nationalists that the Soviets and their propaganda machine were creating and spreading. Émigré periodicals publishing his works were: «Vyzvolna Polityka» and «Vyzvolnyi Shliakh» (London); «Chas» (Fürth, Germany); «Ukrainskyi Samostiinyk» (Munich, Germany); «Homin Ukrainy» (Toronto, Canada); «Ukrainskyi Visnyk» (New York); «Surma»; and more. S. Bandera's signed articles by different pen names: «Siryi S.A.», «Siryi S.B.», «SAS», «Byilykho», «A. Vlast», and «Tesliar». From the perspective of international relations, it could be seen that S. Bandera's key principles were to establish close cooperation among the representatives of all captive nations and to oppose all totalitarian regimes which were taking hold in Eastern Europe and Asia. It was important to connect with the ethnic minorities living with Ukrainians in and out of Ukraine. Keywords: Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), ideology, opinion journalism, nation-building projects, international relations, struggle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".