MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139602628 · doi:10.3901/jme.2013.17.110

A Novel Precision-characterization Model of a Revolute Joint Based on the Concept of Spatial Mechanisms with Redundant Elastic Constraints

2013· article· en· W3139602628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Technology and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevolute jointCharacterization (materials science)Joint (building)Computer scienceStructural engineeringArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceEngineeringNanotechnologyRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

摘要: 提出回转副精度特性的弹性冗余空间机构模型,将实际回转副中的弹性约束等效映射为多个从动件弹性冗余支承,实际回转副零件的几何误差特性等效映射为刚性凸轮轮廓曲面,形成以多组从动件弹性悬浮刚性凸轮几何轮廓的弹性冗余空间机构,从而较真实地反映实际回转副结构及其零件的几何、运动、材料物理性质与工况载荷特性等因素的耦合关系。建立弹性冗余空间凸轮机构的几何位移基本方程、静力平衡方程、物性方程,将回转副精度及其随位置和载荷变化的特性转化为弹性冗余空间机构的位移分析与静力分析求解问题,并给出典型回转副精度特性计算分析与试验测试对比示例,为机器精度分析与设计提供新的理论基础,也为机构学理论开辟新的应用领域。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it