Daytime Equatorial Spread F‐Like Irregularities Detected by HF Doppler Receiver and Digisonde
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Daytime equatorial spread F (ESF) is not as common as nighttime ESF due to the presence of a highly conducting E‐layer during the daytime which counteracts the development of F‐layer plasma irregularities. This study presents two rare daytime ESF‐like events which occurred over an interval ∼2 h and were detected by the HF Doppler receiver located in Lagos (LAG: geographic: 3.27°E, 6.48°N; dip latitude −1.72°) and the Lowell Digisonde at Ilorin (ILR; 4.68°E, 8.50°N; dip latitude −1.25°), managed by Lowell GIRO Data Center (LGDC). Analysis of the first event revealed ∼30 min periodic oscillations in iso‐heights of ionospheric electron density. Shorter period (∼15 min) oscillations appeared simultaneously in HF Doppler measurements and these oscillations lasted nearly 3 h. Close inspection of the ionograms from ILR during this interval (1500–1800 UT) showed the occurrence of small‐scale spreading in the F‐layer trace which varied in altitude as the disturbance progressed. Computation of the linear growth rate of the collisional Rayleigh‐Taylor instability showed that the plasma instability was seeded by a traveling ionospheric disturbance (TID). The characteristics of the second event suggest that horizontal stratifications in plasma density distribution at the reflecting ionospheric layer were responsible for the spread F traces in the ionograms. Analysis of GPS TEC data from Nigeria during these events revealed the presence of wave structures consistent with TIDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it