Accessing health care: responding to diversity.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword Preface 1. Different people, different services? 2. Sex and gender in health care and health policy 3. Services for older people 4. Meeting the needs of people with disabilities 5. Health care for rich and poor alike 6. Access and equity in Australian rural health services 7. Captive populations: prison health care 8. New citizens: East Germans in a united Germany 9. Overseas citizens: citoyens de France 10. Migrants: universal health services in Sweden 11. Asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom 12. Multicultural health care in Britain 13. Roma health: problems and perception 14. 'On our terms': the politics of Aboriginal health in Australia 15. Maori in Aotearoa/New Zealand 16. The history and politics of health care for Native Americans 17. The value and challenges of separate services: First Nation in Canada 18. Delivering Health services in diverse societies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it