MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139932503 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkab078

2021 update to HIV-TRePS: a highly flexible and accurate system for the prediction of treatment response from incomplete baseline information in different healthcare settings

2021· article· en· W3139932503 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Revell, Dechao Wang, Robin Wood, Dolphina Cogill, Raph L Hamers, Peter Reiss, Ard van Sighem, Catherine Rehm, Brian K. Agan, Gerardo Alvarez‐Uria, Julio Montaner, H. Clifford Lane, Brendan Larder, Peter Reiß, Richard Harrigan, Tobias Rinke de Wit, Kim Sigaloff, Vincent C. Marconi, Scott A. Wegner, Wataru Sugiura, Maurizio Zazzi, Rolf Kaiser, Eugen Schuelter, Adrian Streinu‐Cercel, Féderico García, Túlio de Oliveira, José M. Gatell, Elisa de Lazzari, Brian Gazzard, Mark Nelson, Anton Pozniak, Sundhiya Mandalia, Colette Smith, Lı́dia Ruiz, Bonaventura Clotet, Schlomo Staszewski, Carlo Torti, Cliff Lane, Julie A. Metcalf, Marı́a Jesús Pérez-Elı́as, Stefano Vella, Gabrielle Dettorre, Andrew Carr, Karl Hesse, Emanuel Vlahakis, Roos E. Barth, Carl Morrow, Christopher J. Hoffmann, Luminiţa Ene, Gordana Dragović, Ricardo S. Diaz, Cecília Sucupira, Omar Sued, Carina César, Juan Sierra Madero, Pachamuthu Balakrishnan, Shanmugam Saravanan, Sean Emery, David J. Cooper, John D. Baxter, Laura Monno, B. Clotet, Gastón Picchio, Marie-Pierre deBethune, Paul Khabo, Lotty Ledwaba

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsAIDS Vancouver
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsViral loadMissing dataPredictive modellingRegimenStatisticsBaseline (sea)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineClassifier (UML)Internal medicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsImmunologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: With the goal of facilitating the use of HIV-TRePS to optimize therapy in settings with limited healthcare resources, we aimed to develop computational models to predict treatment responses accurately in the absence of commonly used baseline data. METHODS: Twelve sets of random forest models were trained using very large, global datasets to predict either the probability of virological response (classifier models) or the absolute change in viral load in response to a new regimen (absolute models) following virological failure. Two 'standard' models were developed with all baseline variables present and 10 others developed without HIV genotype, time on therapy, CD4 count or any combination of the above. RESULTS: The standard classifier models achieved an AUC of 0.89 in cross-validation and independent testing. Models with missing variables achieved AUC values of 0.78-0.90. The standard absolute models made predictions that correlated significantly with observed changes in viral load with a mean absolute error of 0.65 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL in cross-validation and 0.69 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL in independent testing. Models with missing variables achieved values of 0.65-0.75 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL. All models identified alternative regimens that were predicted to be effective for the vast majority of cases where the new regimen prescribed in the clinic failed. All models were significantly better predictors of treatment response than genotyping with rules-based interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: These latest models that predict treatment responses accurately, even when a number of baseline variables are not available, are a major advance with greatly enhanced potential benefit, particularly in resource-limited settings. The only obstacle to realizing this potential is the willingness of healthcare professions to use the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207