MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Los primeros arbitrajes internacionales en materia ambiental

2021· article· es· W3139940434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriel Ferrer Ortega

Bibliographic record

VenueAnuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyCartographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo discurre sobre las primeras controversias arbitrales internacionales en las que están presentes temas ambientales: Fur Seals Arbitration, United States and the United Kingdom (1893); Trail Smelter Arbitration, United States of America versus Canada (1938 y 1941), y Affaire du Lac Lanoux, Espagne versus France, (1957). Los dos primeros arbitrajes, resueltos antes de la creación de la Corte Internacional de Justicia, dan una idea de una primera concepción, un primer capítulo, del cambiante pensamiento humano hacia el entorno natural, sentando, junto al Affaire du Lac Lanoux, los primeros principios del derecho ambiental internacional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.013
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnuario Mexicano de Derecho InternacionalSame topicMexican Socioeconomic and Environmental DynamicsFrench-language works237,207