Bibliographic record
Abstract
Horst Haselsteiner, ed. The Prague Slav Congress, 1848: Slavic Identities. Boulder: East European Monographs, DLII. Columbia University Press, 2000. vii, 112pp. $44.50, cloth.This slender volume unites some papers presented at the meeting of the Commission Internationale des Etudes Historiques Slaves in Vienna in 1998, the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Prague Slav Congress. Unfortunately, only seven selections are included, reducing a volume originally announced at approximately 300 pages a postAtkins 1 12 pages. Given their restricted number, then, it is probably churlish fault the selections for some unevenness in their quality and overall coherence. At least, each contribution can be given more attention here than would be possible with a larger collection.The volume editor, Horst Haselsteiner, asserts the Prague Slav Congress's lasting impact on its leading representatives through the structural principles it reinforced among them. These principles are, broadly, reciprocity, solidarity and federalism, and he argues that they derived both from Slavic (endogenous) and non-Slavic (exogenous) sources. There are some familiar suspects in this line-up, including Johann Herder, whose chapter on the Slavs is cited in full. Most surprising, perhaps, is his assertion that the United States, through de Tocqueville's Democracy in America, was significant in spreading the concept of federalism at and after the Prague congress. The Czechs and other Austrian Slavs could also have derived a federal model from the Habsburg Monarchy's political organization before the great centralizing reforms of Maria Theresa and Joseph II, however much this raised charges of feudalism from their German Liberal (and centralist) opponents. Haselsteiner's other points, though valid, do not strike the reader as dramatically new-which, since the selected bibliography ends with a work published in 1973, may reflect when the article was prepared.An essay by Edward Thaden, in which he attempts to link the Slavic Congress of 1848 with the Commission Internationale des Etudes Historiques Slaves and the future of Slavic Historical Studies (p. 101), concludes the volume. Thaden succeeds in juxtaposing, not linking, these events, but he does provide a useful and interesting summary of the work of the international commission and in particular the political pressures under which it has sometimes operated. all his readers may join him in urging the commission represent all the Slavic countries in its future membership.Between these two essays are five studies devoted either individuals or individual Slavic nations. Most tenuously related the Prague Congress is the contribution by Bianca Valota on Mazzini and Italian attitudes the Slavs. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".