MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Primary Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Uterine Cervix: Report of Three Cases with Immunohistochemical Study

2012· article· en· W3140390667 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anupam Sarma, Debabrata Barmon, Jagannath Dev Sharma, Amal Chandra Kataki, Chidananda Bhuyan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of cancer research updates · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunohistochemistryLymphomaMedicineCervixPathologyDifferential diagnosisUterine cervixHistopathological examinationDiseaseInternal medicineCancerCarcinoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) involving the uterine cervix and other parts of female reproductive tract are extremely rare and the treatment modalities of this disease are also not well defined. We describe three cases of primary non-Hodgkins lymphoma of the cervix, confirmed to be diffuse large B cell lymphoma on histopathological examination and immunohistochemical study. All other possible primary sites were excluded clinically and radiologically in all the three cases.The clinical history, histopathological features, immunohistochemical features, differential diagnoses and review of literature regarding these cases are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of cancer research updatesSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207