MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3140431514 · doi:10.14740/jmc2291w

Arteriovenous Fistula as a Rare Early Complication of Transradial Coronary Angiography: With Literature Review on Management Strategies

2015· article· en· W3140431514 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Chieng, Bhadresh Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFistulaArteriovenous fistulaComplicationSurgeryAngiographyCoronary angiographyRadiologyRadial arteryArteryCardiologyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iatrogenic arteriovenous (AV) fistula is a vascular complication which may result from coronary angiography. Whilst infrequent via transfemoral access, the incidence in transradial angiography is even rarer with mostly case reports in the literature. Most of these had thus far described transradial AV fistula formation as a delayed complication requiring surgical intervention. Here we describe a rare early case of transradial AV fistula complicating coronary intervention which was managed conservatively with mechanical compression. Follow-up imaging confirmed resolution of fistula. We also reviewed the existing literature on management strategies for transradial AV fistula. We support the use of conservative management as the first-line treatment option for transradial AV fistula, with surgical options reserved for cases involving limb vascular compromise and cardiac insufficiency. J Med Cases. 2015;6(10):453-456 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2291w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicVascular Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207