Anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a specialized intervention that is managed largely by critical care nurses who are educated in the theoretical and practical aspects of the therapy. CRRT is most commonly indicated for hemodynamically unstable patients who have acute renal failure and a narrow margin of tolerance for the rapid fluid shifts associated with traditional dialysis. Although the utilization of CRRT in the critical care setting is becoming more widespread, numerous factors need to be considered before therapy is initiated. The use of anticoagulation is a concern because of the associated risk of bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Nurses at the bedside must be expert in both managing CRRT and assisting in identifying patients who may be at potential risk when this form of treatment is in place. An overview of possible anticoagulants for use in CRRT is outlined in this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it