MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3140669093 · doi:10.25071/10315/35324

State Of Charge And Parameter Estimation Of Electric Vehicle Batteries

2018· article· en· W3140669093 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Bustos, Abu Raihan Mohammad Siddique, Taranjit Cheema, S. Andrew Gadsden, Shohel Mahmud

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState of chargeState (computer science)Electric vehicleEstimationCharge (physics)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsBattery (electricity)Power (physics)AlgorithmSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to rising global environmental issues, electric vehicles (EV) are growing in popularity and will eventually replace vehicles that use internal combustion engines (ICE).EVs draw their power from batteries.Batteries are highly nonlinear storage elements used in a constantly changing environment making them highly dynamic and mathematically complex.In order to approximate the driving range of an EV, the state of charge (SOC) of the battery, which cannot be directly measured, has to be estimated accurately.SOC is highly dependent on the following parameters: internal resistance, temperature, and open circuit voltage.In this paper, two battery equivalent circuit models (ECM) are analyzed in conjunction with a thermal model to track the inner temperature of the battery.The states of the battery are estimated using the popular Kalman filter (KF) and unscented Kalman filter (UKF), and the results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207